AEGISAcme HealthDemo workspace

Knowledge hub

Governance reference library

Law, management standards, responsible AI frameworks and technical safeguards — with practical takeaways for your governance programme.

24 of 24 resources

Tier ALaw · EU

EU AI Act — Regulation (EU) 2024/1689

European Parliament and Council · EUR-Lex

The official legal instrument establishing the EU’s risk-based AI framework.

  • Distinguishes prohibited practices, high-risk systems, transparency and general-purpose AI obligations.
  • Use the articles and annexes to assess applicability; confirm current amendments and implementation guidance.

Access: Free legal text

Search checked · 20 Oct 2026

Official instrument confirmed through search retrieval; direct request returned HTTP 202 without readable text.

eur-lex.europa.eu
Tier AGuidance · EU

Navigating the AI Act

European Commission

Official FAQ on scope, risk categories, general-purpose models and implementation.

  • Clarifies provider and deployer responsibilities, including certain non-EU actors.
  • Organizes implementation questions by topic; the FAQ does not replace the legal text.

Access: Free public resource

Page checked · 20 Oct 2026

Official page retrieved and relevant content inspected.

digital-strategy.ec.europa.eu
Tier AFramework · US · Global

NIST AI Risk Management Framework 1.0

National Institute of Standards and Technology

Voluntary framework for managing AI risks through Govern, Map, Measure and Manage.

  • Structure ownership, context mapping, evaluation and ongoing risk treatment around four functions.
  • Apply multidisciplinary review across the lifecycle; NIST’s online core notes revision work is underway.

Access: Free public resource

Page checked · 20 Oct 2026

Official page retrieved and relevant content inspected.

www.nist.gov
Tier AGuidance · US · Global

NIST AI RMF Playbook

National Institute of Standards and Technology

Suggested actions aligned with RMF outcomes, not a mandatory checklist or prescribed sequence.

  • Select actions appropriate to each AI use case and operating context.
  • Download PDF, CSV, Excel or JSON for internal workflows; updates will follow the RMF revision.

Access: Free public resource

Page checked · 20 Oct 2026

Official page retrieved and relevant content inspected.

airc.nist.gov
Tier AFramework · US · Global

NIST AI 600-1 — Generative AI Profile

National Institute of Standards and Technology

Cross-sector companion extending the AI RMF to generative AI risks and suggested actions.

  • Address confabulation, information integrity, privacy and other GenAI-specific risk areas.
  • Incorporate trustworthiness into design, use and evaluation rather than relying only on output filtering.

Access: Free PDF

Page checked · 20 Oct 2026

Official PDF downloaded successfully; title and publication text inspected.

nvlpubs.nist.gov
Tier AStandard · Global

ISO/IEC 42001:2023 — AI management system

ISO / IEC

Requirements for establishing, implementing, maintaining and continually improving an AI management system.

  • Organize AI policies, objectives, responsibilities and processes into a management system.
  • Use continual improvement to sustain governance; reading an overview does not establish conformity.

Access: Free overview; full standard paid

Search checked · 20 Oct 2026

Official catalogue description retrieved through search; direct access blocked (HTTP 403). Full standard not inspected.

www.iso.org
Tier AStandard · Global

ISO/IEC 23894:2023 — AI risk management

ISO / IEC

Guidance on AI-specific risks and integration of risk management into organizational activities.

  • Integrate AI risk management with existing business functions and processes.
  • Tailor implementation to the organization and application context.

Access: Free abstract; full standard paid

Search checked · 20 Oct 2026

Official abstract retrieved through search; direct access blocked (HTTP 403). Full standard not inspected.

www.iso.org
Tier AFramework · Global

OECD AI Principles

Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development

Intergovernmental values-based principles and policy recommendations for trustworthy, human-centric AI.

  • Frame human rights, transparency, robustness and accountability expectations.
  • Use shared vocabulary for policy and supplier discussions; principles are not a compliance certificate.

Access: Free public resource

Page checked · 20 Oct 2026

Official page retrieved and relevant content inspected.

oecd.ai
Tier AFramework · Global

Recommendation on the Ethics of Artificial Intelligence

UNESCO

Human-rights-centered ethical values, principles and policy-action areas.

  • Include fairness, human oversight and environmental sustainability in governance review.
  • Translate principles into policy work on data, gender and wider societal impacts.

Access: Free public resource

Page checked · 20 Oct 2026

Official page retrieved and relevant content inspected.

www.unesco.org
Tier ARegulator guidance · UK

AI and data protection guidance

Information Commissioner’s Office

Regulator guidance on data-protection law and good practice when AI processes personal data.

  • Review fairness, accountability and risks to people from personal-data processing.
  • Under review following the Data (Use and Access) Act; confirm updated guidance before relying on it.

Access: Free public resource

Page checked · 20 Oct 2026

Official page retrieved and relevant content inspected.

ico.org.uk
Tier AGuidance · UK

Introduction to AI assurance

Department for Science, Innovation and Technology

Practitioner introduction to assurance concepts, techniques and their role in AI governance.

  • Build shared terminology for evidence, assurance mechanisms and oversight.
  • Understand how assurance techniques and technical standards support responsible deployment.

Access: Free public resource

Page checked · 20 Oct 2026

Official page retrieved and relevant content inspected.

www.gov.uk
Tier AGuidance · Singapore · Global

AI Verify Testing Toolkit

AI Verify Foundation

Testing framework and toolkit combining technical tests with governance-process records for traditional AI.

  • Test fairness, explainability and robustness with developers and governance teams.
  • Produce customizable reports; this is not a universal GenAI test suite or compliance certification.

Access: Free / open-source toolkit

Page checked · 20 Oct 2026

Official page retrieved and relevant content inspected.

aiverifyfoundation.sg
Tier AFramework · Singapore

Model AI Governance Framework for Generative AI

AI Verify Foundation / IMDA

Nine-dimension voluntary framework with initial steps toward a trusted GenAI ecosystem.

  • Address accountability across the development and deployment lifecycle.
  • Review data quality, safety and trusted development practices alongside other ecosystem dimensions.

Access: Free public resource

Page checked · 20 Oct 2026

Official page retrieved and relevant content inspected.

aiverifyfoundation.sg
Tier AFramework · India

Responsible AI for All — Part 1: Principles

NITI Aayog

India-focused approach document establishing responsible-AI principles and societal considerations.

  • Ground policy discussions in safety, equality, inclusion, privacy and accountability.
  • Use principles as a starting point and pair them with the operationalization companion.

Access: Free PDF

Page checked · 20 Oct 2026

Official PDF returned HTTP 200; valid PDF payload confirmed and substantive text retrieved through search.

www.niti.gov.in
Tier AGuidance · India

Responsible AI for All — Part 2: Operationalizing Principles

NITI Aayog

Companion approach document focused on putting responsible-AI principles into practice.

  • Pair implementation discussions with Part 1’s principles rather than treating them as standalone law.
  • Use the report’s operational approach to inform governance responsibilities and safeguards.

Access: Free public resource

Page checked · 20 Oct 2026

Official page retrieved and relevant content inspected.

www.niti.gov.in
Tier AGuidance · Canada

Directive on Automated Decision-Making

Treasury Board of Canada Secretariat

Requirements for covered Canadian federal administrative decision systems, not a general private-sector AI law.

  • Examine transparency, accountability and procedural-fairness requirements within the directive’s scope.
  • Use linked scope and impact-assessment guidance when deciding which safeguards apply.

Access: Free government directive

Search checked · 20 Oct 2026

Substantive official directive retrieved through search; direct response was a Request Rejected page.

www.tbs-sct.canada.ca
Tier AGuidance · Canada

Algorithmic Impact Assessment

Treasury Board of Canada Secretariat

Questionnaire determining impact levels for automated decision systems under the federal directive.

  • Assess system design, decisions, data and impacts, including mitigation questions.
  • Review scoring and publication instructions; mandatory use is limited to applicable government scope.

Access: Free public guidance and open-licensed tool

Page checked · 20 Oct 2026

Official page retrieved and relevant content inspected.

www.canada.ca
Tier AGuidance · Australia

Guidance for AI adoption — implementation guidance

National AI Centre · Australian Government

Six essential practices for organizations using complex or higher-risk AI and needing stronger governance.

  • Establish accountability, AI registers and supply-chain oversight.
  • Keep records of testing, incidents, monitoring and governance decisions.

Access: Free public guidance

Search checked · 20 Oct 2026

Substantive official guidance retrieved through search; direct request timed out.

www.ai.gov.au
Tier AGuidance · Global

OWASP Top 10 for LLM Applications

OWASP GenAI Security Project

Community security guidance on major LLM and GenAI application risks and mitigations.

  • Threat-model prompt injection, sensitive-information disclosure and unsafe output handling.
  • Review excessive agency; the canonical page displays 2025 while a 2026 release page is indexed. Version-neutral reference pending reconciliation.

Access: Free public resource

Page checked · 20 Oct 2026

Official page retrieved and relevant content inspected.

genai.owasp.org
Tier AFramework · US · Global

MIT AI Risk Initiative

MIT AI Risk Initiative

Academic gateway to a living AI risk repository and linked risk, incident and governance datasets.

  • Broaden risk identification beyond cybersecurity to societal and human impacts.
  • Explore relationships between risks, incidents, mitigations and governance coverage.

Access: Free public resource

Page checked · 20 Oct 2026

Official page retrieved and relevant content inspected.

airisk.mit.edu
Tier AGuidance · Global

MITRE ATLAS

MITRE

Knowledge base of adversarial tactics and techniques against AI-enabled systems.

  • Use technique identifiers to organize threat models and adversarial test plans.
  • Map security testing to realistic attack behaviors; coverage does not prove system safety.

Access: Free public resource

Page checked · 20 Oct 2026

Official application returned HTTP 200 and MITRE ATLAS title; interactive catalogue requires browser review.

atlas.mitre.org
Tier BVendor documentation · Global

OpenAI Agents SDK — Guardrails

OpenAI

SDK patterns for input, output and tool guardrails with tripwires.

  • Use checks to reject unsafe content or stop an agent run.
  • Review tool and agent guardrail scope; application checks do not replace human approval or broader governance.

Access: Free documentation; model usage may incur charges

Page checked · 20 Oct 2026

Official page retrieved and relevant content inspected.

openai.github.io
Tier BVendor documentation · Global

Amazon Bedrock Guardrails

Amazon Web Services

Configurable safeguards for harmful content, denied topics, sensitive information and grounding.

  • Apply content filters and probabilistic PII blocking or masking to inputs and responses.
  • Evaluate contextual grounding and safeguard limitations; filtering is not a guarantee of correctness.

Access: Free documentation; service usage is charged

Page checked · 20 Oct 2026

Official page retrieved and relevant content inspected.

docs.aws.amazon.com
Tier CAdvisory · Authored

AEGIS gate thresholds & priority formula

AEGIS authored advisory model

Workspace gate floors and remediation priorities are consulting assumptions, not external standards.

  • Gate floors vary by risk tier; priorities combine severity, control weight and risk multiplier.
  • Validate thresholds for your organization before making a release decision.

Access: Included authored model

Dated · Authored Sep 2026

Internal model dated 2026-Q3; no independent external validation.

Authored model · no external link

Checked 20 Oct 2026. Checks cover publisher identity and resource relevance; each entry records its check method. They do not certify compliance or guarantee future availability. Tier A: public institutions, standards bodies and independent research/security organisations; Tier B: vendor documentation; Tier C: AEGIS-authored advice. Standards and frameworks are not laws. No live regulatory feed. Next review 2027-01-15; confirm current legal text and implementation guidance before relying on obligations or dates.