Register the AI systems in scope
Maintain a current inventory before assessing or approving use.
6 systems registeredThis checklist is derived from the live workspace inventory, governance assessment, guardrails, release gate, roadmap and incident register. Maturity, guardrail and release-gate results remain workspace-level; system cards below measure inventory-profile completeness only.
Maintain a current inventory before assessing or approving use.
6 systems registeredCheck system type, accountable owner, supplier and data classification are recorded.
6 of 6 profiles completeResolve systems still under review; an approval status is not a legal classification.
5 of 6 dispositions recordedCapture the approver, rationale and conditions; new decisions supersede rather than erase earlier records.
0 of 6 systems have a current governance decisionRisk acceptance and conditional approvals require a review date; reassess decisions when conditions or system use change.
No current decisions recordedAssess changes to purpose, data, model/provider, autonomy, affected people and controls; implementation must follow an approval record.
No material changes submittedKeep an owner, measurable signal, threshold and review cadence; investigate overdue checks and threshold breaches.
0 of 4 deployed systems have active plans; 0 overdue, 0 latest threshold breaches, 0 active plans awaiting a first readingOnly mark evidence verified when it has been reviewed and supports the control claim.
3 of 7 critical controls verifiedCoverage is calculated at workspace level for the currently selected tier.
18 of 21 required controls enabled (86%)The gate reflects the workspace assessment, not an individual system score.
Workspace gate: BlockedEvery open roadmap item should have a named accountable owner.
0 of 7 open actions assignedRoute each logged incident, assign an owner and track it through closure.
No active incidents recordedThese checks assess whether inventory fields are present. They do not calculate an individual system’s governance score or determine legal applicability.
In-house RAG · Preliminary tier: High-risk · Governance disposition: Approved with limits
4 of 4 profile fields complete: system type, owner, supplier and data classificationVendor model · Preliminary tier: High-risk · Governance disposition: Under review
4 of 4 profile fields complete: system type, owner, supplier and data classificationAgent · 4 tools · Preliminary tier: Limited · Governance disposition: Approved with limits
4 of 4 profile fields complete: system type, owner, supplier and data classificationSaaS feature · Preliminary tier: Minimal · Governance disposition: Approved
4 of 4 profile fields complete: system type, owner, supplier and data classificationSaaS · Preliminary tier: Minimal · Governance disposition: Approved
4 of 4 profile fields complete: system type, owner, supplier and data classificationVendor model · Preliminary tier: Limited · Governance disposition: Not approved
4 of 4 profile fields complete: system type, owner, supplier and data classificationA readiness checklist supports internal governance coordination. It is not a certification, compliance conclusion or legal applicability assessment.